I would first become the user and interact with the feature. I would write down any issues that I had, making sure to focus on the actions that led to the problem.

To provide feedback, I would structure it into sections: the situation and the result.

(Ex.) The user struggled to find the button, causing a delay in completion.

I would then categorize the issue into sections: navigation, clarity, design, and performance.

I would then evaluate the performance as a whole, ensuring all questions regarding the execution are answered.

(Ex.)

• Was the task completed?

• What was the speed of each function?

• Were there any issues in the completion?

• How did (speed, design, etc.) impact the overall result?

I would give constructive criticism, pointing out the issue and suggesting a solution.

I would suggest test runs, including the solutions, to see if there could be a better result.

I would reference other successful designs in terms of their user control and design principles, to get inspiration for improving ours.

OMG! The ability to create and inspire others in a whole new way.

Yes