I’d start by actually using the feature in a real, everyday way and paying attention to where things feel smooth versus confusing. I like to note small friction points like steps that feel unnecessary, buttons that aren’t obvious, or moments where I have to stop and think. Then I’d share clear, specific feedback with examples, what I expected to happen, what actually happened, and how I think it could feel more intuitive. If possible, I’d also suggest simple improvements from a user’s perspective and explain how those changes could make the experience faster or more enjoyable.

What excites me most about AI-driven creative tech is how it turns ideas into visuals almost instantly. I love that I can start with a rough thought, a mood, or even a single sentence and actually see it come to life without needing a huge setup or team. It makes experimenting feel fun instead of intimidating, and it pushes me to try styles and concepts I probably wouldn’t attempt otherwise. I’m especially excited about using AI as a creative partner, not to replace creativity, but to amplify it and help tell stories in new, more visual ways.

Yes! I’ve tested study and AI tools before. What worked best was when features were simple, fast, and actually fit into real student routines, like quick explanations, clean UI, and tools that didn’t require a long setup. What didn’t work were cluttered interfaces, too many steps to get to the main feature, or explanations that felt generic instead of personalized. I usually give feedback on usability, clarity, speed, and whether I’d realistically keep using the tool during a busy week, because that’s what matters most as a student.